Questions
numberFire.com
2 VOTES
Los Angeles Kings LA WPG @ LA Projected Goals: 3.09 Proj Goals: 3.09
0 VOTES
Winnipeg Jets WPG WPG @ LA Projected Goals: 2.15 Proj Goals: 2.15
numberFire.com
2 VOTES
St. Louis Blues STL VAN @ STL Projected Goals: 3.32 Proj Goals: 3.32
0 VOTES
Vancouver Canucks VAN VAN @ STL Projected Goals: 2.18 Proj Goals: 2.18
numberFire.com
1 VOTES
Montreal Canadiens MTL CAR @ MTL Projected Goals: 3.03 Proj Goals: 3.03
1 VOTES
Carolina Hurricanes CAR CAR @ MTL Projected Goals: 2.42 Proj Goals: 2.42
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Toronto Maple Leafs TOR NJ @ TOR Projected Goals: 3.21 Proj Goals: 3.21
1 VOTES
New Jersey Devils NJ NJ @ TOR Projected Goals: 2.41 Proj Goals: 2.41
Rj Hill
What price for lineup generator. For all sports
numberFire.com
1 VOTES
Colorado Avalanche COL EDM @ COL Projected Goals: 2.39 Proj Goals: 2.39
2 VOTES
Edmonton Oilers EDM EDM @ COL Projected Goals: 3.20 Proj Goals: 3.20
numberFire.com
1 VOTES
Nashville Predators NSH CGY @ NSH Projected Goals: 2.93 Proj Goals: 2.93
1 VOTES
Calgary Flames CGY CGY @ NSH Projected Goals: 2.67 Proj Goals: 2.67
numberFire.com
1 VOTES
Boston Bruins BOS TB @ BOS Projected Goals: 2.96 Proj Goals: 2.96
0 VOTES
Tampa Bay Lightning TB TB @ BOS Projected Goals: 2.34 Proj Goals: 2.34
numberFire.com
1 VOTES
Minnesota Wild MIN PHI @ MIN Projected Goals: 3.36 Proj Goals: 3.36
1 VOTES
Philadelphia Flyers PHI PHI @ MIN Projected Goals: 1.96 Proj Goals: 1.96
John Velez
On the Game Projections, I see the probable goalie matchup and the projections based on that. If the starting goalie changes, is a new projection publ...View Full Question
Jake Sanders
Devan Dubnyk, Cam Talbot, Eddie Lack, Curtis McElhinney....View Full Question
  • 0
    ross minor (500 Reputation Points)
    Talbot and Lack are my go ahead guys. Talbot my number one because he is at home against a bad team. That's my 2 cents good luck tonight.
Channing Hindel
I don't like the direction your website is going with the annoying-ass slideshow articles, the new app that won't even let you access the articles and...View Full Question
  • 2
    Ryan Evans (444 Reputation Points)
    As I've said elsewhere, I would prefer what is now called the "freeform" method of posting questions and getting feedback from others be the normal, as before. I'm fine with the new add/drop, start/sit, etc. "poll" type of questions being offered, but perhaps on a separate section of the site, or as an optional alternative to the freeform.

    I think I speak for many users when I say I began visiting this site regularly for the articles and for the way the "freeform" question system worked. It was refreshing being able to discuss difficult fantasy decisions candidly with other players who use NumberFire's metrics and site. Now, with the canned poll-style questions being pushed, this is now simply like many, many other sites out there. It has lost it's unique appeal, and a critical piece that brought many to NumberFire in the first place.

    I don't run the site and certainly don't have insight into reason this decision was made. I'm sure it was discussed at length and not some snap decision. But again, I think I speak for many others when I say I liked the freeform as it was and now find it difficult to sort through a screen full of high-level "select player A, B, or C" questions to get at the information and topics I really want.

    Just my two cents.
numberFire.com
2 VOTES
Florida Panthers FLA ARI @ FLA Projected Goals: 3.01 Proj Goals: 3.01
0 VOTES
Arizona Coyotes ARI ARI @ FLA Projected Goals: 2.32 Proj Goals: 2.32
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Ottawa Senators OTT PIT @ OTT Projected Goals: 2.47 Proj Goals: 2.47
2 VOTES
Pittsburgh Penguins PIT PIT @ OTT Projected Goals: 2.67 Proj Goals: 2.67
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Washington Capitals WSH CBJ @ WSH Projected Goals: 2.76 Proj Goals: 2.76
1 VOTES
Columbus Blue Jackets CBJ CBJ @ WSH Projected Goals: 2.20 Proj Goals: 2.20
numberFire.com
3 VOTES
Chicago Blackhawks CHI DAL @ CHI Projected Goals: 3.90 Proj Goals: 3.90
0 VOTES
Dallas Stars DAL DAL @ CHI Projected Goals: 2.42 Proj Goals: 2.42
  • 0
    Rhett Kinard (576 Reputation Points)
    i don't think you can go wrong with fitz or taylor. philly pass d is miserable
  • 0
    That Guy (500 Reputation Points)
    Fitzpatrick has done very well this season and is the most consistent of the 3.
numberFire.com
2 VOTES
Los Angeles Kings LA WPG @ LA Projected Goals: 3.09 Proj Goals: 3.09
0 VOTES
Winnipeg Jets WPG WPG @ LA Projected Goals: 2.15 Proj Goals: 2.15
numberFire.com
2 VOTES
Florida Panthers FLA ARI @ FLA Projected Goals: 3.01 Proj Goals: 3.01
0 VOTES
Arizona Coyotes ARI ARI @ FLA Projected Goals: 2.32 Proj Goals: 2.32
numberFire.com
1 VOTES
Nashville Predators NSH CGY @ NSH Projected Goals: 2.93 Proj Goals: 2.93
1 VOTES
Calgary Flames CGY CGY @ NSH Projected Goals: 2.67 Proj Goals: 2.67
numberFire.com
1 VOTES
Montreal Canadiens MTL CAR @ MTL Projected Goals: 3.03 Proj Goals: 3.03
1 VOTES
Carolina Hurricanes CAR CAR @ MTL Projected Goals: 2.42 Proj Goals: 2.42
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Washington Capitals WSH CBJ @ WSH Projected Goals: 2.76 Proj Goals: 2.76
1 VOTES
Columbus Blue Jackets CBJ CBJ @ WSH Projected Goals: 2.20 Proj Goals: 2.20
numberFire.com
1 VOTES
Minnesota Wild MIN PHI @ MIN Projected Goals: 3.36 Proj Goals: 3.36
1 VOTES
Philadelphia Flyers PHI PHI @ MIN Projected Goals: 1.96 Proj Goals: 1.96
Rj Hill
What price for lineup generator. For all sports
  • 0
    Rhett Kinard (576 Reputation Points)
    i don't think you can go wrong with fitz or taylor. philly pass d is miserable
  • 0
    That Guy (500 Reputation Points)
    Fitzpatrick has done very well this season and is the most consistent of the 3.
Jake Sanders
Devan Dubnyk, Cam Talbot, Eddie Lack, Curtis McElhinney....View Full Question
  • 0
    ross minor (500 Reputation Points)
    Talbot and Lack are my go ahead guys. Talbot my number one because he is at home against a bad team. That's my 2 cents good luck tonight.
numberFire.com
1 VOTES
Colorado Avalanche COL EDM @ COL Projected Goals: 2.39 Proj Goals: 2.39
2 VOTES
Edmonton Oilers EDM EDM @ COL Projected Goals: 3.20 Proj Goals: 3.20
numberFire.com
2 VOTES
St. Louis Blues STL VAN @ STL Projected Goals: 3.32 Proj Goals: 3.32
0 VOTES
Vancouver Canucks VAN VAN @ STL Projected Goals: 2.18 Proj Goals: 2.18
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Ottawa Senators OTT PIT @ OTT Projected Goals: 2.47 Proj Goals: 2.47
2 VOTES
Pittsburgh Penguins PIT PIT @ OTT Projected Goals: 2.67 Proj Goals: 2.67
numberFire.com
1 VOTES
Boston Bruins BOS TB @ BOS Projected Goals: 2.96 Proj Goals: 2.96
0 VOTES
Tampa Bay Lightning TB TB @ BOS Projected Goals: 2.34 Proj Goals: 2.34
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Toronto Maple Leafs TOR NJ @ TOR Projected Goals: 3.21 Proj Goals: 3.21
1 VOTES
New Jersey Devils NJ NJ @ TOR Projected Goals: 2.41 Proj Goals: 2.41
numberFire.com
3 VOTES
Chicago Blackhawks CHI DAL @ CHI Projected Goals: 3.90 Proj Goals: 3.90
0 VOTES
Dallas Stars DAL DAL @ CHI Projected Goals: 2.42 Proj Goals: 2.42
John Velez
On the Game Projections, I see the probable goalie matchup and the projections based on that. If the starting goalie changes, is a new projection publ...View Full Question
Channing Hindel
I don't like the direction your website is going with the annoying-ass slideshow articles, the new app that won't even let you access the articles and...View Full Question
  • 2
    Ryan Evans (444 Reputation Points)
    As I've said elsewhere, I would prefer what is now called the "freeform" method of posting questions and getting feedback from others be the normal, as before. I'm fine with the new add/drop, start/sit, etc. "poll" type of questions being offered, but perhaps on a separate section of the site, or as an optional alternative to the freeform.

    I think I speak for many users when I say I began visiting this site regularly for the articles and for the way the "freeform" question system worked. It was refreshing being able to discuss difficult fantasy decisions candidly with other players who use NumberFire's metrics and site. Now, with the canned poll-style questions being pushed, this is now simply like many, many other sites out there. It has lost it's unique appeal, and a critical piece that brought many to NumberFire in the first place.

    I don't run the site and certainly don't have insight into reason this decision was made. I'm sure it was discussed at length and not some snap decision. But again, I think I speak for many others when I say I liked the freeform as it was and now find it difficult to sort through a screen full of high-level "select player A, B, or C" questions to get at the information and topics I really want.

    Just my two cents.
numberFire.com
2 VOTES
Los Angeles Kings LA WPG @ LA Projected Goals: 3.09 Proj Goals: 3.09
0 VOTES
Winnipeg Jets WPG WPG @ LA Projected Goals: 2.15 Proj Goals: 2.15
numberFire.com
1 VOTES
Colorado Avalanche COL EDM @ COL Projected Goals: 2.39 Proj Goals: 2.39
2 VOTES
Edmonton Oilers EDM EDM @ COL Projected Goals: 3.20 Proj Goals: 3.20
numberFire.com
2 VOTES
Florida Panthers FLA ARI @ FLA Projected Goals: 3.01 Proj Goals: 3.01
0 VOTES
Arizona Coyotes ARI ARI @ FLA Projected Goals: 2.32 Proj Goals: 2.32
numberFire.com
2 VOTES
St. Louis Blues STL VAN @ STL Projected Goals: 3.32 Proj Goals: 3.32
0 VOTES
Vancouver Canucks VAN VAN @ STL Projected Goals: 2.18 Proj Goals: 2.18
numberFire.com
1 VOTES
Nashville Predators NSH CGY @ NSH Projected Goals: 2.93 Proj Goals: 2.93
1 VOTES
Calgary Flames CGY CGY @ NSH Projected Goals: 2.67 Proj Goals: 2.67
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Ottawa Senators OTT PIT @ OTT Projected Goals: 2.47 Proj Goals: 2.47
2 VOTES
Pittsburgh Penguins PIT PIT @ OTT Projected Goals: 2.67 Proj Goals: 2.67
numberFire.com
1 VOTES
Montreal Canadiens MTL CAR @ MTL Projected Goals: 3.03 Proj Goals: 3.03
1 VOTES
Carolina Hurricanes CAR CAR @ MTL Projected Goals: 2.42 Proj Goals: 2.42
numberFire.com
1 VOTES
Boston Bruins BOS TB @ BOS Projected Goals: 2.96 Proj Goals: 2.96
0 VOTES
Tampa Bay Lightning TB TB @ BOS Projected Goals: 2.34 Proj Goals: 2.34
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Washington Capitals WSH CBJ @ WSH Projected Goals: 2.76 Proj Goals: 2.76
1 VOTES
Columbus Blue Jackets CBJ CBJ @ WSH Projected Goals: 2.20 Proj Goals: 2.20
numberFire.com
0 VOTES
Toronto Maple Leafs TOR NJ @ TOR Projected Goals: 3.21 Proj Goals: 3.21
1 VOTES
New Jersey Devils NJ NJ @ TOR Projected Goals: 2.41 Proj Goals: 2.41
numberFire.com
1 VOTES
Minnesota Wild MIN PHI @ MIN Projected Goals: 3.36 Proj Goals: 3.36
1 VOTES
Philadelphia Flyers PHI PHI @ MIN Projected Goals: 1.96 Proj Goals: 1.96
numberFire.com
3 VOTES
Chicago Blackhawks CHI DAL @ CHI Projected Goals: 3.90 Proj Goals: 3.90
0 VOTES
Dallas Stars DAL DAL @ CHI Projected Goals: 2.42 Proj Goals: 2.42
Rj Hill
What price for lineup generator. For all sports
John Velez
On the Game Projections, I see the probable goalie matchup and the projections based on that. If the starting goalie changes, is a new projection publ...View Full Question
  • 0
    Rhett Kinard (576 Reputation Points)
    i don't think you can go wrong with fitz or taylor. philly pass d is miserable
  • 0
    That Guy (500 Reputation Points)
    Fitzpatrick has done very well this season and is the most consistent of the 3.
Jake Sanders
Devan Dubnyk, Cam Talbot, Eddie Lack, Curtis McElhinney....View Full Question
  • 0
    ross minor (500 Reputation Points)
    Talbot and Lack are my go ahead guys. Talbot my number one because he is at home against a bad team. That's my 2 cents good luck tonight.
Channing Hindel
I don't like the direction your website is going with the annoying-ass slideshow articles, the new app that won't even let you access the articles and...View Full Question
  • 2
    Ryan Evans (444 Reputation Points)
    As I've said elsewhere, I would prefer what is now called the "freeform" method of posting questions and getting feedback from others be the normal, as before. I'm fine with the new add/drop, start/sit, etc. "poll" type of questions being offered, but perhaps on a separate section of the site, or as an optional alternative to the freeform.

    I think I speak for many users when I say I began visiting this site regularly for the articles and for the way the "freeform" question system worked. It was refreshing being able to discuss difficult fantasy decisions candidly with other players who use NumberFire's metrics and site. Now, with the canned poll-style questions being pushed, this is now simply like many, many other sites out there. It has lost it's unique appeal, and a critical piece that brought many to NumberFire in the first place.

    I don't run the site and certainly don't have insight into reason this decision was made. I'm sure it was discussed at length and not some snap decision. But again, I think I speak for many others when I say I liked the freeform as it was and now find it difficult to sort through a screen full of high-level "select player A, B, or C" questions to get at the information and topics I really want.

    Just my two cents.

Sorry, there are no more questions for this feed.