Questions


Minnesota Wild
MIN
ARI @ MIN
Projected Goals: 3.12
Proj Goals: 3.12

Arizona Coyotes
ARI
ARI @ MIN
Projected Goals: 2.30
Proj Goals: 2.30


Los Angeles Kings
LA
VGS @ LA
Projected Goals: 2.47
Proj Goals: 2.47

Vegas Golden Knights
VGS
VGS @ LA
Projected Goals: 2.99
Proj Goals: 2.99


Montreal Canadiens
MTL
CGY @ MTL
Projected Goals: 3.30
Proj Goals: 3.30

Calgary Flames
CGY
CGY @ MTL
Projected Goals: 2.42
Proj Goals: 2.42


-
-1Liam (500 Reputation Points)I just joined for 1 month $9.99 premium with coupon code (PlayingLegal)



St. Louis Blues
STL
COL @ STL
Projected Goals: 2.59
Proj Goals: 2.59

Colorado Avalanche
COL
COL @ STL
Projected Goals: 3.36
Proj Goals: 3.36


Edmonton Oilers
EDM
VAN @ EDM
Projected Goals: 3.41
Proj Goals: 3.41

Vancouver Canucks
VAN
VAN @ EDM
Projected Goals: 2.64
Proj Goals: 2.64

-
0Brett Clark (500 Reputation Points)Yes, as a paid subscriber, I also have the same question.
-
0Andy Brown (305 Reputation Points)....well, which catchers do you have?
-
-1Rayford Munk (500 Reputation Points)I watched NFL with NFLSQTV .COM and I think they have the best option to watch regular season too.

-
0ross minor (500 Reputation Points)Talbot and Lack are my go ahead guys. Talbot my number one because he is at home against a bad team. That's my 2 cents good luck tonight.

-
2Ryan Evans (444 Reputation Points)As I've said elsewhere, I would prefer what is now called the "freeform" method of posting questions and getting feedback from others be the normal, as before. I'm fine with the new add/drop, start/sit, etc. "poll" type of questions being offered, but perhaps on a separate section of the site, or as an optional alternative to the freeform.
I think I speak for many users when I say I began visiting this site regularly for the articles and for the way the "freeform" question system worked. It was refreshing being able to discuss difficult fantasy decisions candidly with other players who use NumberFire's metrics and site. Now, with the canned poll-style questions being pushed, this is now simply like many, many other sites out there. It has lost it's unique appeal, and a critical piece that brought many to NumberFire in the first place.
I don't run the site and certainly don't have insight into reason this decision was made. I'm sure it was discussed at length and not some snap decision. But again, I think I speak for many others when I say I liked the freeform as it was and now find it difficult to sort through a screen full of high-level "select player A, B, or C" questions to get at the information and topics I really want.
Just my two cents.


San Jose Sharks
SJ
ANA @ SJ
Projected Goals: 3.15
Proj Goals: 3.15

Anaheim Ducks
ANA
ANA @ SJ
Projected Goals: 2.84
Proj Goals: 2.84


Ottawa Senators
OTT
WPG @ OTT
Projected Goals: 2.88
Proj Goals: 2.88

Winnipeg Jets
WPG
WPG @ OTT
Projected Goals: 3.58
Proj Goals: 3.58



-
0That Guy (500 Reputation Points)Fitzpatrick has done very well this season and is the most consistent of the 3.
-
-1Rhett Kinard (576 Reputation Points)i don't think you can go wrong with fitz or taylor. philly pass d is miserable


Minnesota Wild
MIN
ARI @ MIN
Projected Goals: 3.12
Proj Goals: 3.12

Arizona Coyotes
ARI
ARI @ MIN
Projected Goals: 2.30
Proj Goals: 2.30


San Jose Sharks
SJ
ANA @ SJ
Projected Goals: 3.15
Proj Goals: 3.15

Anaheim Ducks
ANA
ANA @ SJ
Projected Goals: 2.84
Proj Goals: 2.84


Edmonton Oilers
EDM
VAN @ EDM
Projected Goals: 3.41
Proj Goals: 3.41

Vancouver Canucks
VAN
VAN @ EDM
Projected Goals: 2.64
Proj Goals: 2.64


Montreal Canadiens
MTL
CGY @ MTL
Projected Goals: 3.30
Proj Goals: 3.30

Calgary Flames
CGY
CGY @ MTL
Projected Goals: 2.42
Proj Goals: 2.42






-
2Ryan Evans (444 Reputation Points)As I've said elsewhere, I would prefer what is now called the "freeform" method of posting questions and getting feedback from others be the normal, as before. I'm fine with the new add/drop, start/sit, etc. "poll" type of questions being offered, but perhaps on a separate section of the site, or as an optional alternative to the freeform.
I think I speak for many users when I say I began visiting this site regularly for the articles and for the way the "freeform" question system worked. It was refreshing being able to discuss difficult fantasy decisions candidly with other players who use NumberFire's metrics and site. Now, with the canned poll-style questions being pushed, this is now simply like many, many other sites out there. It has lost it's unique appeal, and a critical piece that brought many to NumberFire in the first place.
I don't run the site and certainly don't have insight into reason this decision was made. I'm sure it was discussed at length and not some snap decision. But again, I think I speak for many others when I say I liked the freeform as it was and now find it difficult to sort through a screen full of high-level "select player A, B, or C" questions to get at the information and topics I really want.
Just my two cents.


St. Louis Blues
STL
COL @ STL
Projected Goals: 2.59
Proj Goals: 2.59

Colorado Avalanche
COL
COL @ STL
Projected Goals: 3.36
Proj Goals: 3.36


Los Angeles Kings
LA
VGS @ LA
Projected Goals: 2.47
Proj Goals: 2.47

Vegas Golden Knights
VGS
VGS @ LA
Projected Goals: 2.99
Proj Goals: 2.99


Ottawa Senators
OTT
WPG @ OTT
Projected Goals: 2.88
Proj Goals: 2.88

Winnipeg Jets
WPG
WPG @ OTT
Projected Goals: 3.58
Proj Goals: 3.58

-
0Brett Clark (500 Reputation Points)Yes, as a paid subscriber, I also have the same question.
-
0Andy Brown (305 Reputation Points)....well, which catchers do you have?
-
-1Rayford Munk (500 Reputation Points)I watched NFL with NFLSQTV .COM and I think they have the best option to watch regular season too.

-
-1Liam (500 Reputation Points)I just joined for 1 month $9.99 premium with coupon code (PlayingLegal)

-
0That Guy (500 Reputation Points)Fitzpatrick has done very well this season and is the most consistent of the 3.
-
-1Rhett Kinard (576 Reputation Points)i don't think you can go wrong with fitz or taylor. philly pass d is miserable
-
0ross minor (500 Reputation Points)Talbot and Lack are my go ahead guys. Talbot my number one because he is at home against a bad team. That's my 2 cents good luck tonight.


Minnesota Wild
MIN
ARI @ MIN
Projected Goals: 3.12
Proj Goals: 3.12

Arizona Coyotes
ARI
ARI @ MIN
Projected Goals: 2.30
Proj Goals: 2.30


St. Louis Blues
STL
COL @ STL
Projected Goals: 2.59
Proj Goals: 2.59

Colorado Avalanche
COL
COL @ STL
Projected Goals: 3.36
Proj Goals: 3.36


San Jose Sharks
SJ
ANA @ SJ
Projected Goals: 3.15
Proj Goals: 3.15

Anaheim Ducks
ANA
ANA @ SJ
Projected Goals: 2.84
Proj Goals: 2.84


Los Angeles Kings
LA
VGS @ LA
Projected Goals: 2.47
Proj Goals: 2.47

Vegas Golden Knights
VGS
VGS @ LA
Projected Goals: 2.99
Proj Goals: 2.99


Edmonton Oilers
EDM
VAN @ EDM
Projected Goals: 3.41
Proj Goals: 3.41

Vancouver Canucks
VAN
VAN @ EDM
Projected Goals: 2.64
Proj Goals: 2.64


Ottawa Senators
OTT
WPG @ OTT
Projected Goals: 2.88
Proj Goals: 2.88

Winnipeg Jets
WPG
WPG @ OTT
Projected Goals: 3.58
Proj Goals: 3.58


Montreal Canadiens
MTL
CGY @ MTL
Projected Goals: 3.30
Proj Goals: 3.30

Calgary Flames
CGY
CGY @ MTL
Projected Goals: 2.42
Proj Goals: 2.42

-
0Brett Clark (500 Reputation Points)Yes, as a paid subscriber, I also have the same question.


-
0Andy Brown (305 Reputation Points)....well, which catchers do you have?
-
-1Rayford Munk (500 Reputation Points)I watched NFL with NFLSQTV .COM and I think they have the best option to watch regular season too.


-
-1Liam (500 Reputation Points)I just joined for 1 month $9.99 premium with coupon code (PlayingLegal)


-
0That Guy (500 Reputation Points)Fitzpatrick has done very well this season and is the most consistent of the 3.
-
-1Rhett Kinard (576 Reputation Points)i don't think you can go wrong with fitz or taylor. philly pass d is miserable

-
0ross minor (500 Reputation Points)Talbot and Lack are my go ahead guys. Talbot my number one because he is at home against a bad team. That's my 2 cents good luck tonight.

-
2Ryan Evans (444 Reputation Points)As I've said elsewhere, I would prefer what is now called the "freeform" method of posting questions and getting feedback from others be the normal, as before. I'm fine with the new add/drop, start/sit, etc. "poll" type of questions being offered, but perhaps on a separate section of the site, or as an optional alternative to the freeform.
I think I speak for many users when I say I began visiting this site regularly for the articles and for the way the "freeform" question system worked. It was refreshing being able to discuss difficult fantasy decisions candidly with other players who use NumberFire's metrics and site. Now, with the canned poll-style questions being pushed, this is now simply like many, many other sites out there. It has lost it's unique appeal, and a critical piece that brought many to NumberFire in the first place.
I don't run the site and certainly don't have insight into reason this decision was made. I'm sure it was discussed at length and not some snap decision. But again, I think I speak for many others when I say I liked the freeform as it was and now find it difficult to sort through a screen full of high-level "select player A, B, or C" questions to get at the information and topics I really want.
Just my two cents.
Sorry, there are no more questions for this feed.