Questions
Eric Ronne
Should I send Frank Gore for Darren McFadden?
Which one of these two RBs is more valuable at this point? My league is 10 team 0.5 PPR, and starting 3 RBs. My other two are Ahmad Bradshaw and Ray Rice.
-
1dong le (461 Reputation Points)Mcfadden has a softer schedule. That being said hes not the same ol mcfadden. Hes slower and less explosive so its a toss up1 Comment↳Stephen Yeager (500 Reputation Points)I think it's more that Oakland just isn't very good, personally.
-
1Andy Cochrane (110 Reputation Points)Personally I would rate DMC slightly above Gore. Particularly with the PPR element added. However the difference isn't massive and provided neither get injured they should produce about the same.1 Comment↳Thomas Naughton (458 Reputation Points)From weeks 2-6, Gore has 7 receptions to DMC's 8 (His reception stats are inflated by his 13-catch week 1). The PPR element is essentially negligible between the 2.
-
0Anthony Best (381 Reputation Points)I would say no.. Gore has been doing better than DMC has and with less carries.. I just don't think DMC will be able to hold out for rest of the season with 20-30 touches a game.
-
0Thomas Naughton (458 Reputation Points)Gore has scored 18 more points than DMC to this point in the season, and the 49ers actually seem to know what they're doing on offense (We'll discount this week). Both are injury risks, with DMC having the greater risk. And Gore has more catches if we don't count week 1 where DMC did his best WR impression and caught 13 passes (To make it fair, we'll also not count week 1 for Gore). I would keep Gore as he is a very-high end RB2 at this point in the season and will likely be the more consistent of the two, along with the least injured.
Darren McFadden
No Recent News
Frank Gore
No Recent News
Darren McFadden
No Recent News
Frank Gore
No Recent News