Log in to numberFire

To get the full benefits of numberFire, please log in.

You'll get the best projections in the business!

Don't have an account? Click here to sign up!

Start Winning In Seconds

To get the full benefits of numberFire, please sign up.

You'll get the best projections in the business!

By registering, you indicate that you agree to the Terms Of Service.

Already have an account? Click here to log in!
Questions
Ask Question +
Marty Enz
Just offered Cutler McKinnon B. Tate and G. Olsen for Peyton.
Guy has two horrible TEs T Richardson and G. Bernard.

I still have
Gronk
Mccoy
Ellington
Foster
Sankey

Do I have a chance?
  • 0
    Erik MD (503 Reputation Points)
    Wrong week to try and move Cutler. I see how you got there, but wrong week to try and move him - If Cutler had put up numbers like he did last week maybe... (depending on who the Manning owner is)

    Not a horrible horrible offer or anything, but Manning is borderline untouchable right now. If you and I were talking we'd be talking Gronk, McCoy Ellington, type guys - guys with pedigree and numbers, as opposed to guys (with the exception of Olson) with just numbers, who you could actually argue are sell highs.

    I don't think this deal gets done. If you can get this kind of a deal done, it is a lot, but probably worth it. Like I said though, no idea how this gets done.
    4 Comments
    ↳
    Marty Enz (512 Reputation Points)
    I'm playing on his weaknesses. thinking about offering Cutler and gronk for luck. is that to little? Who is worth more olsen or gronk?
    ↳
    Erik MD (503 Reputation Points)
    This all having been said, like where your head is at with it and this kind of a deal is a splashy one that has a chance to make your season. Maybe, given the other strengths you have at RB (if you believe in Mckinnon and I know I do), and you want to get this done, maybe package a different RB and keep McKinnon as your #3 - I don't know. Just spit balling. This is tough deal to try and get done
    ↳
    Erik MD (503 Reputation Points)
    I think that Gronk is worth more, if nothing else based on name and the offense he is in. My thoughts at first flush are, Gronk's name value you helps you to get something done, Olson's actual value gets you wins. Also: Trying for Luck is a great idea. No way this guy ever plays Luck if Manning is healthy
    ↳
    Erik MD (503 Reputation Points)
    Also: I read Ben Tate as Golden Tate - woops. This is better than I thought. Still, I stand by my thoughts generally
  • 0
    Greg Thomas (449 Reputation Points)
    Olsen is the #2 TE behind Julius Thomas. I think it is fair as McKinnon is still a mystery. You have ridiculous RB depth so you don't need the RBs you likely won't start like Tate. Cutler is still good, but Manning is on another planet now and his entire offense is clicking while the Bears WRs are banged up. Go through with the trade.
  • 0
    Sean Leto (552 Reputation Points)
    Yeah, That's a solid trade. If he can look past Chicago's gm against Miami, should be a no brainer.
    2 Comments
    ↳
    Sean Leto (552 Reputation Points)
    Although, for a trade like that, you should really wait until manning isn't in every single publication on the web. Shoot, I think I saw him on the cover of cosmo.
    ↳
    Marty Enz (512 Reputation Points)
    Haha. he still has to like the consistency from olsen and the potential of mckinnon. not to mention Cutler and Tate aren't slouches by any means
Question Tags
Peyton Manning No Recent News
NFL
Related Questions
Question Tags
Peyton Manning No Recent News
NFL