Questions
Graham & Patterson & Fred Jackson FOR Demaryius & Marshall & Olsen
12-team standard scoring.
Start: 1 QB, 1 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 RB/WR/TE, 1 K, 1 D

My team:
QB: RG3
RBs: D Martin, F Gore, B Tate, T West, B Pierce, F jackson, L Blount
WRs: Julio, C Patterson, K Britt
TEs: Jimmy, Gronk
K: Bryant
D: none

Not only am I short on receivers, but this would just give me a lot more flexibility for the flex spot. If I don't make a roster move, I'll end up starting Gronk and Graham every week which could mean missing out my bench RBs.

I do love the idea of keeping the top 2 TEs, but that means relying on C-Pat... Not sure how safe that is, though I'm some waiver options with come around eventually.

Should I go for a trade (this one or something else that nets me receivers) OR ride the G-train?

Thanks!
  • 3
    Doug Mason (500 Reputation Points)
    I think it's a great trade for you. My trust in Julio Jones is a little shaken after last year, and this guarantees you the ability to start at least two top WR's, and vastly opens up your options in flex.
  • 2
    Noah Hilton (500 Reputation Points)
    I would do that in a second. A WR corp of DT, Marshall, and Julio is beastly. Patterson and Jackson are a cheap price to pay, and you get a solid (if unspectacular) TE back in Olsen.
  • 1
    Danny B (396 Reputation Points)
    I think this is a great deal for you and I would make the trade in a heartbeat in your position. You're getting 2 of the top 5 WRs without giving up your top RBs. Olsen is a downgrade at TE compared to Graham, but you're getting back much more than you're giving up if you make this trade.
  • 1
    Rate my wife (551 Reputation Points)
    And yea, just noticed your QB is RG3. Puke...
    1 Comment
    Doug Mason (500 Reputation Points)
    And I just noticed your "name"...lol...
  • 0
    Rate my wife (551 Reputation Points)
    Demaryius would be nice but your giving up too much here. Get something better back than Olsen? Look for other deals?

    Gronk and Jimmy are both studs, and it will give you huge advantage over peeps in playoffs at TE. Buttt, Gronk's injuries scare me persoanlly.
    2 Comments
    Jake Levy (416 Reputation Points)
    Marshall is better than Olsen...
    Doug Mason (500 Reputation Points)
    I'm a huge NE fan, and even I shied away from Gronk in the draft...he's a stud...but he's only played 57% of New England's games over the last 2 years...
  • 0
    Rate my wife (551 Reputation Points)
    Demaryius would be nice but your giving up too much here. Get something better back than Olsen? Look for other deals?

    Gronk and Jimmy are both studs, and it will give you huge advantage over peeps in playoffs at TE. Buttt, Gronk's injuries scare me persoanlly.
  • 0
    Zach Brunner (399 Reputation Points)
    I would pair Graham with someone to upgrade your RBs. Maybe pair him with Jackson or Pierce and get a good RB and a WR like Michael Floyd out of it? I would definitely try to upgrade RB significantly, upgrade your WR too, then drop Blount to pick up a D. You might wanna drop another RB and pick up another TE if you're scared there wont be one when you need them. I'm sure there's a TE with good upside on waivers.
    2 Comments
    Zach Brunner (399 Reputation Points)
    Don't rule out trading the Tate/West combo either if someone is willing to buy into it.
    Jake Levy (416 Reputation Points)
    I'm very high on the muscle hamster. And yes, I've already sent out multiple Tate/West offers for a WR
Question Tags
Brandon Marshall No Recent News
Demaryius Thomas No Recent News
Fred Jackson No Recent News
Greg Olsen No Recent News
Jimmy Graham No Recent News
Question Tags
Brandon Marshall No Recent News
Demaryius Thomas No Recent News
Fred Jackson No Recent News
Greg Olsen No Recent News
Jimmy Graham No Recent News