Questions
possibly trade either leshoure or rashad jennings or both for hakeem nicks
giving up just leshoure would be nice, just jennings is ok, both: ehh.parentheses is bench
1 qb: peyton manning (matt ryan, freeman)
2 rb: lynch, charles (bradshaw, leshoure, jennings)
2 wr: megatron, colston (wallace on flex, stevie johnson)
1 te: rudolph (pettigrew)
1 flex: wallace
k: zuerlein
d: cards
-
1Dustin Anderson (500 Reputation Points)Looks like a good trade for me. Also you don't really need 3 QBs. See if you can get away with either of those RBs (preferably Jennings as he is less proven at this juncture) but if you have to offer both go for it. Nicks might take a week or so to light it up, but it will happen sooner or later.1 Comment↳BigBills (500 Reputation Points)agreed
-
0JD (500 Reputation Points)Seattle (Lynch) and New York (Bradshaw) have the same BYE week (11), Leshoure faces GB that week, and JC faces Cincy, and Jennings is at Houston.
-
0dong le (461 Reputation Points)You really dont need a wr, id take 2 other wr for ur 2 rbs
-
0Matthews (542 Reputation Points)i think you want to trade leshoure for nicks if you can pull it off....i would also try to shop manning and bradshaw together for an elite rb....or ryan if you prefer peyton. both have been thru bye so freeman is a safety net for you
-
0John Strauser (500 Reputation Points)I don't think that you need Nicks since you already have Megatron and Colston, but if you are intent of getting him I would try to give up one of the QBs that you have instead. If I had to choose between those RBs to give up I would choose Jennings, simply because Jones-Drew will eventually be back and diminish his carries whereas LeShoure is the starting RB in Detroit going forward.1 Comment↳Andy Cochrane (110 Reputation Points)Agree fully.
-
0Dan McClintock (500 Reputation Points)Take Nicks as fast as you can
Hakeem Nicks 
Mikel Leshoure 
Rashad Jennings