Log in to numberFire

To get the full benefits of numberFire, please log in.

You'll get the best projections in the business!

Don't have an account? Click here to sign up!

Start Winning In Seconds

To get the full benefits of numberFire, please sign up.

You'll get the best projections in the business!

By registering, you indicate that you agree to the Terms Of Service.

Already have an account? Click here to log in!
Questions
Ask Question +
John Strauser
Should I offer Vick, Wayne, and either AP or Charles for Foster and Fitzgerald?
My league is a 8-team league. I have to start a QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, and a FLEX each week.
My QBs: Michael Vick, Ben Roethlisberger, and RG3
My RBs: Adrian Peterson, Jamaal Charles, Shonn Greene, and Rashard Mendenhall
My WRs: Calvin Johnson, Percy Harvin, Reggie Wayne, and Antonio Brown
Please no "yes" or "no" answers, I want reasons to do or to not do the trade.
  • 0
    Andy Cochrane (110 Reputation Points)
    If it is an 8 team league I would consider getting rid of Greene but by the by. I would be very leery of getting rid of AP. he is just fantastic, although getting Foster back negates it but leaves you where you are roughly regarding RB. I don't see the need for this TBH. Fitzgerald isn't an upgrade on anyone else on your WR corps in particular. I wouldn't personally do this as structured at present.
  • 0
    Anthony Best (381 Reputation Points)
    Vick over Fitz, and I would keep AP.. he should only get stronger as season goes on.. but if you can grab Foster I would do this.. He is getting good numbers and the whole Hou team says they are not running good enough. How do you not like that as his owner.. and in a 8 team league you can really afford this deal.. try it.. try Vick at First, but may need to give up Ben or Rg instead. So offer Vick/Charles and Wayne.
    2 Comments
    ↳
    Matt Mannie (500 Reputation Points)
    if he's going to target foster - i thin he should do a 2 for 1 - fitz is no upgrade over anything in his wr list. and vick's sched and reid's post bye week histoery tell me to let berger go before vick. and while the texans say they aren't running the ball well sounds good but what if they don't turn it around. and we can't look at charles production - even though up and down as a throw-away in this deal. but for me - i try a charles ben for foster if i'm married to the idea of getting him.
    ↳
    Anthony Best (381 Reputation Points)
    Very true.. Fitz is no upgrade over any of his current WR's, but he also won't lose out at WR also.. I think it just makes the trade look better to the one giving up Foster.
  • 0
    Matt Mannie (500 Reputation Points)
    no - vick has been up and down so far but has a very nice r.o.s. sched. and no one is better at fixing his offense during a bye week than reed. i don't see fitz - especially with the uncertainty at qb in az - as an upgrade to your wr core - and charles also has a great schedule from here. foster is the best back in the game for the most part, but i think you're giving up way too much. the drop of to charles from here doesn't warrant giving up vick, and i believe wayne could outproduce fitz from this point in the season. good luck john
  • -1
    Ankit Monga (424 Reputation Points)
    no
    1 Comment
    ↳
    John Strauser (500 Reputation Points)
    Did you not see this "Please no "yes" or "no" answers, I want reasons to do or to not do the trade."?
Question Tags
Adrian Peterson No Recent News
Arian Foster No Recent News
Jamaal Charles No Recent News
Larry Fitzgerald No Recent News
Michael Vick No Recent News
Reggie Wayne No Recent News
NFL
Related Questions
Question Tags
Adrian Peterson No Recent News
Arian Foster No Recent News
Jamaal Charles No Recent News
Larry Fitzgerald No Recent News
Michael Vick No Recent News
Reggie Wayne No Recent News
NFL