Who Have Been the Best Players in the NBA According to MVP Voting?
Bill James is one of my favorite writers in sports. No one else can take such complex issues and innovations and talk you through them conversationally and make you feel like youâ€™re contributing to the groundbreakingness thatâ€™s happening. Sometimes in my spare time, Iâ€™ll go through old articles of his and read to see if thereâ€™s anything new I can find thatâ€™s applicable to other sports.
I ran across this article on finding â€œThe Worldâ€™s Number One Starting Pitcherâ€ and thought perhaps I could do the same for the NBA. However, itâ€™s not quite that easy in a sport like basketball or football, where things arenâ€™t just one-on-one battles. Tennis, pitchers, golf…you can isolate statistics; in basketball or football, things just get too messy.
But then I ran across this article by Justin Kubatko from 2008 on Basketball Reference.
Anyway, the point of this article was to find the worldâ€™s best player, short of just â€œwho had the highest win shares that yearâ€ or some other all-in-one metric. Justinâ€™s idea was to take MVP award shares, weight them over the last couple of seasons, and see what we have. In Justinâ€™s words, â€œWhile the best player may not win the MVP award every year, I think it is reasonable to assume that a player who has received significant MVP support over a period of years is a candidate for the title of best player in the NBA.â€
Thus, he came up with the following formula:
- - 0.4 times his MVP award share in season x, plus
- - 0.3 times his MVP award share in season (x â€“ 1), plus
- - 0.2 times his MVP award share in season (x â€“ 2), plus
- - 0.1 times his MVP award share in season (x â€“ 3)
Justin went way back to the beginnings of the NBA, starting with 1959â€™s winner Bob Pettitt, but obviously ended with 2007â€™s winner Steve Nash. Well, todayâ€™s article is to update Justinâ€™s idea and see where weâ€™ve stood since his article was last written.
Letâ€™s recap the historical winners and then get to the recent ones:
Surprisingly, or perhaps not surprisingly, Steve Nash was legimately considered the best player in the NBA, at least for two years running. During the Lakers run of three straight championships, we only have one year with a Laker -- Shaq in 2001 -- meanwhile, the rest of the early 2000â€™s were completely dominated by Tim Duncan and Nash.
So where have we been since then according to this forumla?
Kevin Durant getting on this list probably wonâ€™t happen because of how much it will drop you to lose a year to injury. Stephen Curry is probably the front-runner to overtake LeBron James next year, but even that is unlikely. Curry would have to beat LeBron in terms of total percentage of shares by over 20% -- something he did this year, to be fair -- but one that I donâ€™t see happening again.
Anthony Davis is probably the dark-horse (or favorite depending on who you ask) to win the MVP next year, and it wonâ€™t be long before he runs through this list much like Russell in the 60â€™s, Kareem in the 70â€™s, and LeBron in the mid-teens.
However, it probably wonâ€™t be next year. Even if Davis takes 0.998 of the award shares (highest ever by LeBron in 2013), LeBron himself would have to take only about .200 of the shares (itâ€™s not zero-sum, if you havenâ€™t figured it out by the way) to still lead over him. However, doing that plus anywhere in the top-three the following year would nearly ensure the beginning of his reign.
So who is the best player in the NBA? According to this: LeBron. But maybe not for long.