Questions
Small Paul
How does this trade match up - Think deny.
I proposed Eifert, Cooks, Woodhead for Jamaal, Evans He countered Gronk, Cooks, Woodhead for Jamaal, Evans
Where do we think this trade stands, I think having Gronk is more valuable than getting Jamaal. But its not a terrible trade.
My team -
Rb - Ivory, Woodhead, L. Murray, Coleman, M. Jones, Miller
WR - D. Thomas, Cooks, Robinson, Parker, Baldwin
TE - Eifert, Gronk
His team -
Rb - Jamaal, McCoy, Gurley, Mason, Mathews, Andre Williams
WR - Evans, Sanders, V.Jax, Watkins, C. Johson, Colston
TE - Owen Daniels
-
1Heisenberg (482 Reputation Points)I always say never trade Gronk, but Eifert might be the TE2 moving forward. You are getting the better WR here (Evans > Cooks) so its essentially Gronk vs Charles. I think I'd lean toward taking the deal given your RB situation, but I can see you saying no. Gronk is awesome.1 Comment↳Small Paul (479 Reputation Points)Thanks, I know its pretty close. I am trying to swindle him by asking for Watkins instead of Evans in the original deal. So Charles + Watkins for Eifert + Cooks + any RB essentially
-
0Heisenberg (482 Reputation Points)I always say never trade Gronk, but Eifert might be the TE2 moving forward. You are getting the better WR here (Evans > Cooks) so its essentially Gronk vs Charles. I think I'd lean toward taking the deal given your RB situation, but I can see you saying no. Gronk is awesome.
Jamaal Charles
No Recent News
Rob Gronkowski
No Recent News
Jamaal Charles
No Recent News
Rob Gronkowski
No Recent News