Saints WRs - Colston, Cooks, or Stills?

Questions

Ask Question +

To vote or ask a question, please login or !

brickthrees

Saints WRs - Colston, Cooks, or Stills?

1

Shane Cox (500 Reputation Points)
Stills. Colston is getting older and starting to lose a step. He'll still be productive I think, though. I really hate going with rookie WR's because they rarely pan out. Keenan Allen's aren't common. Although Cooks is a beast and the Saints throw the ball like crazy, I'd go with Stills. He's currently being drafted 195 in ESPN's mock draft and 2nd year wr's have been historically tearing it up lately.
1 Comment

↳

brickthrees (500 Reputation Points)
I like Stills' value late.
0

Dane Peterson (332 Reputation Points)
One more here for Stills. I think it's pretty close, but having a year in the system will give him the edge over Cooks. Stills is a streaker, and his stats should be less sporadic this year. I hope to land him as a WR3/4 on my teams.
0

Leo Howell (304 Reputation Points)
Colston is definitely still worth keeping an eye on. Cooks won't live up to his expectations this year, but if it's dynasty or a keeper league he's a solid option, and Stills figures to be the Lance Moore "other Saints receiver" to own this year.
0

Vic Hedges (500 Reputation Points)
I'd go with Cooks for now and for the future. Teams usually don't trade up to get a player unless they really like him and have big plans for him. I know that's not a scientific analysis, but for me, it carries a decent amount of weight.
0

Alex Chamberlain (500 Reputation Points)
Colston is the safe bet simply because of consistency. Colston will once again be an average 2nd WR for a fantasy team. Kenny Stills showed flashes of brilliancy last year, so it will be interesting to see how he works into the Saints offense with the departure of Lance Moore. Colston is a safer bet though.