0Keith Goldner
Should go 13-3 or 14-2 again. The team is too talented and you can't bet against Bill.

1Jeff Servos
Although, technically, time will only tell, I'm gunna go ahead and say Brady...Good luck catching up to that laundry list of achievements Rodgers...

1Keith Goldner
In a 6-point pass TD league the top tier of QBs improve. While RBs may still be the value picks in the beginning, it's more important in this kind of league to get one of the top 5 guys: Rodgers, Manning, Brees, Rivers, Brady. Because of the pass TD totals, they separate themselves a little more from the Ryan/Flacco types. Schaub could go either way. Check out the draft kit to see how the overall ranks are affected by 6-pt pass TDs. That should give you a good idea of the positions relative value.

4Ron Hogsett
I agree, this year it seems likes QBs have been going earlier than years past. My strategy has been based on the league I'm drafting in(12man vs 10man, 4 point passer TD vs 6) and my draft position. In a 10 man with Yahoo! default, I can see QB's start going by the 2nd round. I personally like the idea of grabbing a QB early enough to snag a top 5 considering they are top "point-getters" season after season. If you are playing in a smart league, it’s plausible that the top 5 QBs could all be gone by the end of the 2nd round. Drafting a QB late would have to be determined by the quality of RB's you’ve taken in the first two picks and the quality of WR's available in your 3rd and 4th picks, and which QB may be available in the 5th and 6th rounds (typically those outside the top 10). I think waiting beyond the 4th round for a QB would be a mistake. In a 6 point passer TD league, I'd expect the top 10 QB's to be gone by the end of the 2nd round. QB's outside the top 10 have an EV that quickly drops, relative to expected point production. At the expense of a top running back, I'd prefer to see a more consistent QB in the early early rounds of the draft in this situation.So, to answer, I would say drafting first overall in a league with 4 point passer TD is too early, but not in a 6 point passer TD league.

4Matt Gregg
First and foremost, you should always draft for value ahead of position. That said, it's also good to pay attention to who's coming off the board by position, so keep a cheat sheet on hand. I agree w Anthony, you have to get a solid RB in the first two rounds in PPR--then shoot for the best available WR/RB in 3/4. I'd try and take a QB in the 5th since this is an 8 man league.

1shaun morse
Brady has never thrown deep to Branch. His long receptions are generally because of YAC. Ocho has promise as a deep threat if he and Brady can get on the same page.

1Anthony Best
I started to think Hernandez was the better of the 2 last year until I saw that it's consistently Gronk that's found on the endzone!!

0Jd Dre
Tonight he was, yesterday Fitzpatrick and Cam Newton were, Thursday Rodgers was along with Brees.On any given day, you never know.Henne didn't play that awful bad, either.

0shaun morse
Depends who you are replacing him with.

1Nik Bonaddio
Nice! A little help from numberFire too?

0Keith Goldner
I think Brady is on another level from Rivers. Rivers puts up numbers but Brady and Peyton run their entire offenses.

1Sean Weinstock
Niners!

2Alex Cuba
i think you'll end up kicking yourself if you get rid of Brady. Difference between Sanchez and Brady is huge. Also depends on who your RBs are.

1James Steigelman
Not sure what the question is here.

1Geoffrey Nappi
yes

0Anthony Best
Ray Rice!!

0Anthony Best
Have to say Brady since I have Foster on my team in the money league!!

2Robert James Smith
I would only trade Brady if you could get Calvin as there is such a huge drop off to Big Ben. You have the best WR as far as points in the league right now which helps make up for your lack of depth. Try and trade Big Ben coming off his 5 TD game with week for a WR2 type player

0Anthony Best
those would both be good pick ups! Brady does have a harder schedule than Cam overall, but last few games in season Brady wins on match-ups

0Naveen Tejwani
You can get a better offer for Cam; personally I wouldn't do it for Brady and CJ. However you will have to take a gamble like that to get back in the race and if you don't start winning now, it won't matter. Look for a little bit better situation in that 2-1 offer.

0Dan Comly
This trade sounds like it's just what the doctor ordered for you. I wouldn't worry for a second about giving Newton for Brady. I'm actually more confident in Brady from here on out. Two points about the Chris Johnson part. First, there's maybe a 5%-10% chance that he pulls himself out of the slump and you're golden. Second, you can afford to just bench him in the meantime (or indefinitely) because you have a decent lineup of RBs to choose from already.On the other hand, you could package one or more of those RBs in the deal to make it sweeter and try to procure a top 10 RB. Food for thought. Hope that helps!

1Jameson Wooten
Team one: Cam, Sit DJax, start Giants DTeam two: Brady, Roddy, Welker, Boldin, Sproles, Murray, Gronk

0Anthony Best
Toss up. I think Both will struggle! Both are away, but I like Stafford coming of the bye a little better

0Anthony Best
I would actually sit a struggling Brady going against Phi at Phi. He will still get 15-10 points for you, but Stafford is facing a GB D that isn't good against the pass. Detroit also has no running game, just RB's that are short WR's so more upside for Stafford.

0Keith Goldner
I'd go Brady. Can't bench him.

1Anthony Best
I still think Stafford at home is the better option. Brady is still struggling and pretty sure their center is still going to be the 3rd stringer cause of injuries.

1Keith Goldner
It's an idea, but I wouldn't. I would just stash an able backup who will be in a playoff race just in case. Chances are, Rodgers will still play a half (in which he can put up better fantasy numbers than most other QBs). If you do Brady/Brees, there's a chance they could be benched as well.