1Aaron Jackson
Eagles should fly to 12 wins. They're going to be a tough team to stop, even if Vick goes down. People forget how good Vince Young is.

2Ron Hogsett
The numbers say Rodgers, my emotion says Vick. Rodgers also brings less risk (as far as injuries are concerned) to your portfolio than Vick does. In reviewing last year's numbers, both were similar average in yards/completion, average yards/game and average passing attempts/game. With similar numbers but with Rodgers being slightly more accurate and less of a risk, Rodgers would be a better pick over Vick.

0Tom Becker
Depends on the league. Manning is the poster child of consistency whereas Vick is the high risk high reward man. I'm more of a fan of Manning just because you know for sure what you are getting, but no one can argue with either guy.

0walid khwaja
I disagree though with most answers here that Rivers should go 1st in the draft. I don't think there is any QB that can put up the numbers that Vick does on a weekly basis.

4Nate Tharp
Vick is the most athletic player in the league. But it doesn't get much better than watching Rodgers surgically pick apart defenses and toss up 40 points.

0Keith Goldner
Vick is the most exciting player in the league, not even close.

2David Romero
Vick is def. more exciting. I'll take Vick any day of the week over Rivers especially with Philly's squad!

7walid khwaja
Depending on your strategy (I would always pick a top RB over a QB) Vick should be the 1st QB to go. I understand his chances of getting injured are prob higher then most QB's but he will consistently get you top QB points every week.

3walid khwaja
No! Everyone has a bad game sooner or later. Im just happy it came in the preseason and not when it counts.

4Ron Hogsett
I agree, this year it seems likes QBs have been going earlier than years past. My strategy has been based on the league I'm drafting in(12man vs 10man, 4 point passer TD vs 6) and my draft position. In a 10 man with Yahoo! default, I can see QB's start going by the 2nd round. I personally like the idea of grabbing a QB early enough to snag a top 5 considering they are top "point-getters" season after season. If you are playing in a smart league, it’s plausible that the top 5 QBs could all be gone by the end of the 2nd round. Drafting a QB late would have to be determined by the quality of RB's you’ve taken in the first two picks and the quality of WR's available in your 3rd and 4th picks, and which QB may be available in the 5th and 6th rounds (typically those outside the top 10). I think waiting beyond the 4th round for a QB would be a mistake. In a 6 point passer TD league, I'd expect the top 10 QB's to be gone by the end of the 2nd round. QB's outside the top 10 have an EV that quickly drops, relative to expected point production. At the expense of a top running back, I'd prefer to see a more consistent QB in the early early rounds of the draft in this situation.So, to answer, I would say drafting first overall in a league with 4 point passer TD is too early, but not in a 6 point passer TD league.

1Nik Bonaddio
In a 6 point passing TD league, I think if you can get Aaron there, it might be a great pick. Ditto with Tom Brady. The draft kit can definitely help you with this!

0Keith Goldner
I think so. Last year was an outlier and he's too fragile. He's a great player, but not worth more than a Philip Rivers.

2James Gray
Eagles/Rams. Can't wait to see if Vick can come even close to last year's performance.

0Daniel Okopnyi
That depends on your scoring and settings, he will be top of his game, but that's kind of hard to predict. Standard scoring? Minimum 20.

3shaun morse
Definitely Hakeem Nicks. Nicks will be getting a ton a targets against a weak WASH secondary missing Landry. DJ is a home run hitter. DJax is not nearly as effective in a ppr format as opposed to standard scoring.

1Murphy Bug
As we saw last night, Mike Kafka can play in the NFL. He went 7-9 for 72 yards in an attempt to lead the Eagles back against the Falcons. Had it not been for Maclin dropping a perfect pass on fourth down, Kafka could have completed the comeback. Also, don't forget about Vince Young, whom Andy Reid says is at "almost 100%". The Eagles have not yet named a starter, but they have a pro-bowler in Young and a blossoming talent in Kafka. This is all assuming Vick doesn't start, which is only speculation at this point.

3Jd Dre
They can if DeSean and Maclin would catch balls that hit them in the hands!How many KEY drops did they have?

1Steve Morris
I prefer Yahoo just because that's what I'm used to. I find that managing my lineup and adding/dropping players is easier. I think ESPN's content (projections/articles) are more valuable though.

0Frank Lenz
I'd go with Fitzpatrick, I think he is furreal.

1Jared Cook
Vick looks really risky right now.

0Sean Weinstock
I'm starting to have a lot more faith in Buffalo and Fred Jackson. I love McFadden though. Not sure if I want a Cinci or Denver receiver. Who's your QB otherwise?

2Nik Bonaddio
Wait, you're getting Vick? Or Jackson? If you're giving Jackson up, absolutely.

0Keith Goldner
Vick

2Morse Moose
I also have Vick and Beanie. I was however looking to trade my back-up in Newton along with Beanie for a top tier RB. But it doesn't seem that my league is a trading league, so I might have to run with Vick and Newton for the year.

1Morse Moose
I think I'm going to be starting Newton. Thinking he'll be a better play with Vick going into a bye week. Plus, I like Newton's match-up against Atlanta over Washington.

1Anthony Best
At this point I think I would rather have Cam.. Phi All around is making Mistakes.. Vick is trying to force himself and his team to do better.. Cam right now, just looks more calm and is smarter with the decisions he is making..

0Romish Badani
Depends on your current WR and TE options, but I generally like that deal. Dez is poised to have a huge rest of the year.

0Keith Goldner
I'd probably go with Cam.

1Keith Goldner
I don't like it unless you're desperate and have a suitable back up TE. Graham is winning leagues for people right now with his production at TE (think Antonio Gates) and Vick is a sell low.

0Anthony Best
I feel like I have answered this! I would go with Cam. He has put up better numbers than Vick all season. Also should be a tough match for Vick

0Anthony Best
I don't know If I will like to have Green over next few weeks. they will be facing the hardest weeks of their schedule and they have not proven themselves against top teams yet!

1Keith Goldner
Yes.

1Keith Goldner
Depends if you need Santonio. If you need a WR2 then I'd go for it, otherwise, I'd look for better options.

0Jay Buente
All could be busts, so I would go with the most upside in Vick. Fitzpatrick is a close second

0Mikey Panagatos
vick

1Benoit Martin
QB: Romo: hard to bench after latest performancesWRs: Calvin, A.J. Green, AustinRBs: McCoy, Reggie Bush: McCoy and Bush are money right nowTE: FinleyFlex: Spiller