0Tom Becker
I think they outperformed their expectation last year. Expect a return to the mean, probably 7 to 9 wins for them.

1Stacy Robert Reagan
I think McFadden could have another big year. I'm also scared of Forte losing some goal line looks...

0Bob Reed
Forte, especially in PPR. He's been one of the only bright spots in the Bears offense the last few years.

1Johnny Hewitt
Forte, but they are similar players. I would take anyone in the high-flying Eagles offense.

0PEJ
A lot of people really like Matt Forte this year - including numberFire's draft kit! - but Turner is my choice here. He's a really safe choice.

0Johnny Hewitt
I actually think Forte, but you can't go wrong with either of them. Both will score and both are good receiving backs.

0Bob Reed
Forte because he has a much bigger impact on the passing game.

2Bob Reed
McCoy is more exciting, but both are great producers.

1Keith Goldner
Forte, mostly because of his effect on the passing game. You know what you're getting from Turner every game and every down.

5Michael Cardwell
Felix will have the best statistical year of his career. Julio Jones will be good enough to leach receptions from Roddy White all year. I don't see why Blount won't have his best year in TB. A true breakout star though is ready in St. Louis in Lance Kendricks. TE1 on the depth chart, he led the pass-happy preseason offense of the Rams in receptions and stats. Remains to be seen if they will continue their pass-happy ways with a Pro Bowler like Steven Jackson in the backfield, but something tells me Josh McDaniels just can't resist stretching that golden arm of Sam Bradford. I mean hell, the Broncos led the league in passing with an average arm in Kyle Orton last year. Kendricks is a beast with good hands, good feet, and can block surprisingly well for a rookie, keeping this huge target on the field for most all downs.

3Keith Goldner
Depends on your league settings, but I think Forte is more valuable than Nicks. A 1-2 punch of AP and Forte is really valuable along with the potential of both Blount and Greene.

3Keith Goldner
Yeah, I would do that. Don't think Manningham is that great (although your WR are hurting really bad). Amendola is a throw-away (marginal upside in a PPR league, though) and Forte is by far the best player in that deal, especially in PPR. Having Charles/Forte is great (and I assume you have a good QB since the receivers are so mediocre. Greene won't catch many balls either. I would do it if I were you.

2Nik Bonaddio
Hmm, Forte and Jackson are about equal in my book as well. I think I'd lean towards Forte.

1Bo Busch
I would roll with Forte this week. He is going to get the carries and the looks through the passing game. I think they will be down so Forte is in for a solid week 1.

2Matt Gregg
AP DOMINATES the Lions, traditionally. Forte is running against a Green Bay team that is second worst in the NFL against RBs--not to mention that he accounted for more than half of the Bears offense last week. Though MIN has not been great against the run the past 2 weeks, I would put Best in the third spot behind AP and Forte.

0Nik Bonaddio
You must be really hard up for RBs. I think you can definitely get a higher return on your players than that.

0Brendan Drew
How many players can you start at each position? I would rank your RBs as follows: McCoy, Forte, Tolbert (depending on extent of injury), McCluster. Your WRs ranked, with McCluster: Wallace, Boldin, Manningham (if cleared to play), McCluster. Wait on Manningham's status, otherwise McCluster is your 4th best option for both WR and RB.

2Alex Cuba
i think you'll end up kicking yourself if you get rid of Brady. Difference between Sanchez and Brady is huge. Also depends on who your RBs are.

0Ashley Sanders
Definitely. I think CJ will turn it around and you can't get him at a lower value than right now.

0Keith Goldner
Yeah I like your thinking . I'd go Foster, Bradshaw and Forte

1Anthony Best
depends on the other owner.. I myself would not accept this trade!! Maclin is their leading Receiver and Forte is too involved in Chi offense. Roddy has been disappointing and BLount is too inconsistent. I wish Blount was more involved in the passing game, then I wouldn't bench him so much.

0Anthony Best
That would be a no-go for me! In long run I think Bowe will be better than Roddy, Felix and Sproles are a wash to me. But Forte is too much of Chi offense for me to give up. Blount has a pretty difficult schedule until week 15

3Peter Dedes
I wouldnt change whats been working. Is Campbell around? Your team would be very packer heavy with Rodgers, Jennings and Nelson.

2Peter Dedes
I'd keep forte, Rice and Forte could help you win your leagues and will continue to produce. Can you really get a stud receiver and wells? Like Jennings or Fitz or who? WRs can be streaky, RBs are pretty consistent and the Bears see the huge value of putting Forte in the action. I'm a Bears fan and hear it on the radio and the news.

0Keith Goldner
I wouldn't give up Forte or CJ. Might not get rid of Fred Jackson or Blount unless Stafford is a ridiculous upgrade at QB.

1Keith Goldner
Megatron gonna go ham.

0Anthony Best
those would both be good pick ups! Brady does have a harder schedule than Cam overall, but last few games in season Brady wins on match-ups

1Robert James Smith
I think he'd be crazy to do it but it cant hurt to ask

3Tom Kastorff
Tough call. Forte has been a beast, but so has Jennings. They are pretty even in points, so it might come down to how your league is set up. One consideration: Rodgers is on fire, and Rodgers is throwing a ton, and Rodgers is throwing a ton to Jennings. So he will get his points, almost guaranteed. Forte is the only real weapon for CHI right now, so he could get beat up, injured, or start getting stacked at the line more often as the season goes. You are weaker at RB so the trade could make sense. This is a judgement call and depends on your league points set up.

3Michael Rippe
As always, it depends on your league structure and current team. DeAngelo Williams has been almost non-existent this season and highly unreliable. Steve Smith has been a top 5 WR (a surprise) while Matt Forte has been a top 5 RB. If you are playing with PPR, Forte is even more impressive. Matt Forte is the best player in this trade, and usually you want the best player in any trade.

0Sean Weinstock
I think any cultural imposition on the British is the least we could do after that whole colonization thing...too soon? But seriously, they're thinking about a permanent team in London - not sure how they'd play West Coast teams unless it's in a neutral stadium.

0Greg Stone
Forte!! He gets 50% of Chicago's total yards.

0Anthony Best
both should stay hot! Forte only has 1 tough run D to face, while FJax faces 3. But I do like them both. You can definitely go either way. I don't see either on slowing down!

2Khai Nguyen
At this point in the season, it would be Barber. He has the momentum with Forte out, whille Jacobs has the disadvantage with Bradshaw coming back and some not so great matchups.

0Anthony Best
need to know who else is a possible pick up. I don't mind Tolbert though. he's a good Td Vulture.