1Tom Becker
They should vie for a playoff spot again this year. It will be tough in the same division as Atlanta. I think they'll go 9-7.

2Johnny Hewitt
Blount. Always exciting when any play can escalate into a fist fight

0Christopher M Davis
Blount! Hurdling for the win. Every time. Nothing like watching a guy wither in front of Blount and go for the legs only to have Blount literally run over the would be tackler. The Bucs are worth watching for Josh Freeman, but reason number 1.2 is Blount's ridiculous athleticism. Not the fastest dude on the field, but when you can levitate, you don't have to be.

0Keith Goldner
Blount. Everyone seems to think he is primed for a huge year (as long as he doesn't throw any punches).

0Tom Becker
LeGarrette is poised for a huge year. Bush will take the back seat until McFadden gets hurt.

0Jim R
Blount, Jackson is no contest!

2Christopher M Davis
Peyton Hillis, he can catch and run for days. Alstott 2.0

5Michael Cardwell
Felix will have the best statistical year of his career. Julio Jones will be good enough to leach receptions from Roddy White all year. I don't see why Blount won't have his best year in TB. A true breakout star though is ready in St. Louis in Lance Kendricks. TE1 on the depth chart, he led the pass-happy preseason offense of the Rams in receptions and stats. Remains to be seen if they will continue their pass-happy ways with a Pro Bowler like Steven Jackson in the backfield, but something tells me Josh McDaniels just can't resist stretching that golden arm of Sam Bradford. I mean hell, the Broncos led the league in passing with an average arm in Kyle Orton last year. Kendricks is a beast with good hands, good feet, and can block surprisingly well for a rookie, keeping this huge target on the field for most all downs.

1Anthony Best
you just have to add the player yourself. Click on your team and type players name in the search box that is located next t each individual player, so in this case RB

1Anthony Romanelli
I'd go Turner. Atlanta has more weapons so they'll likely be able to move the ball consistently. It would give Turner more scoring chances. Detroit's D-Line is pretty good and TB doesn't have all the options the Falcons do, so they might only walk away with a pair of TD's.

1Ashley Sanders
I actually don't like Blount's matchup at all. Detroit is very underrated, and their d-line is going to wreak some havoc this year.

3Ashley Sanders
I'd sit Blount.Also, make sure you tag the players in your question. It makes it easier for people to find!

0Ron Hogsett
I like both here, but I rather go up against Washington's defense rather than Detroit's, therefore I vote Bradshaw. Aside from the defenses they'll be seeing, I think both would put up similar numbers.

1Bo Busch
I would roll with Forte this week. He is going to get the carries and the looks through the passing game. I think they will be down so Forte is in for a solid week 1.

2Anthony Best
Can't say worried just upset that he didn't do a thing this week! but not much u can do as a rb when your teams allows themselves to get that far behind in a game.

1Will Lucas
I would start Moreno (if healthy - hasn't practiced this week) and Hightower. Woodhead and Spiller are wild cards. Blount's had 5 touches week 1 and faces a stiff vikings run defense. It appears Morris doesn't trust Blount yet, turning to Ernest Graham for the majority of the game.

0Ashley Sanders
Hightower is definitely one. As for the other, I think I like either Blount or Spiller. Moreno and Spiller are definitely out.

0Keith Goldner
I like Greene this week, expect Jets to run a ton while they're killing the Jags.

2Brendan Drew
I would select Blount and Hightower. Blount will certainly receive more carries, and thus YPG, because Tampa showed their single dimensional air attack was poor. Hightower is Washington's feature back - and not in any form of timeshare - so I value him about Wells and Best, both of whom are often nicked up. I just don't see CJ2K producing this week. Johnson is still working himself into shape and I can't see him gathering yardage against Baltimore. However, since he was likely your first round pick and it is tough to put his potential on the bench, Johnson wouldn't be the longest stretch.

0Nik Bonaddio
Haha, thanks for the tags, Andrew. I actually it'd be an infinitely higher percentage of tags, since you're dividing by zero, but whatever. :)

0Antonio Barajas
You took him in the first round so you have to play him. This should be his breakout week now that he's had plenty of reps in the offense and should be getting out of "lockout mode". If he doesn't put up decent number after this week 1. I'd be worried, 2. I would bench him until he proves otherwise.

0Patrick King
I'd take Brees and Gates. Brees is so consistent and much better than Freeman. Don't take on Bowe... you can get a better offer. He's boom or bust and now that JC is out he's the person that opposing D's will game plan for.

3Keith Goldner
If it's full PPR, I'd probably go with McCluster (Blount never catches a pass)

0Anthony Best
I say Blount! IND just lost a starting LB for the season and have also given up 4 rushing TD's so far!Hillis is coming of being sick with strep throat and said to have lost 10 pounds.He has also had a limited practice this week so hard to say if he will be anywhere close to 100% on sunday

1Anthony Best
depends on the other owner.. I myself would not accept this trade!! Maclin is their leading Receiver and Forte is too involved in Chi offense. Roddy has been disappointing and BLount is too inconsistent. I wish Blount was more involved in the passing game, then I wouldn't bench him so much.

0Anthony Best
That would be a no-go for me! In long run I think Bowe will be better than Roddy, Felix and Sproles are a wash to me. But Forte is too much of Chi offense for me to give up. Blount has a pretty difficult schedule until week 15

2numberFire, inc.
I would do that. Wallace is much better than Marshall and Blount and Turner are about equal.

0Keith Goldner
I wouldn't give up Forte or CJ. Might not get rid of Fred Jackson or Blount unless Stafford is a ridiculous upgrade at QB.

0Frank Lenz
Yeah that trade improves your team but I don't think you're getting enough value for Blount.

0Anthony Best
I don't really like Blount's schedule later on in the season but they will need him desperately and he should be healthy after their bye week. Murray is great but only for a few weeks. Tolbert as long as he stays healthy will remain the red-zone option on that team!! Don;t like Morris.Detroit hasn't been a good run team all season, and it seems Morris isn't as involved with the passing game where Best received all his points! you have to go with Blount or Tolbert!! especially since both of their QB's are struggling badly!

0Sean Weinstock
Who is Shane Bannon?

0Anthony Best
I would go with Blount!! I can't see any BUF WR's doing anything against the Jets secondary!

1Tom Kastorff
Uh easy YES. Tebow is struggling and will be lucky to keep the job, Blount is an injury machine. You are all but guaranteed 30 pts a week with Cam. If you have strong RB's you are good to trade immediately.

1Dave Harris
A QB in the flex is always a more appealing option, although I see why you're hesitant. I think Tebow will be much better this week against Oakland, and you gotta love his red zone appeal, if he can get the Broncos there. Dalton is definitely the better QB option, but I think if you're in a position to take a chance, go w Tebow. He has the most upside.

0Keith Goldner
Yeah, I think that's great. Just keep in mind, Brees is out next week cause of his bye.

1Christopher James Anderson
I like White best (shootout, NO not great vs. WRs), Blount, then BJGE.

0Anthony Best
I would. Blount is useless since Tb is always playing from behind and I don;t see that changing. If he was involved in the passing game at all this would be different. Julio can blow up any game but is to injury prone right now with these hamstring injuries. Is there a reason you are picking up 2 QB's though? I would think you are only in need of 1, unless you play 2 QB's in your league!

0Will Hentzel
First of all, keep Bradshaw. his injury won't last, and he was in the top ten. I would drop Jackson, and pick up Blount. he is a decent back, and puts up good stats.

1Shannon Jones
Blount

0Anthony Best
I did. Had to take the gamble. Also a foot injury for a RB is never a good thing. even if he returns.

0Evan Scherer
Id take blount and foster....carolina has a horrible run defense and you can count on foster getting a lot of screen passes with an unexperienced qb

0Keith Goldner
Felix I think. Blount has more blow up potential, but Felix will be consistent against 2 soft run defenses.

0Keith Goldner
Sit Moss and Demaryius