0Stacy Robert Reagan
I think they made just enough moves for another superbowl run... fear the HOODIE. I'll say 12-4/13-3 or so...

1Jeff Servos
Although, technically, time will only tell, I'm gunna go ahead and say Brady...Good luck catching up to that laundry list of achievements Rodgers...

1Keith Goldner
In a 6-point pass TD league the top tier of QBs improve. While RBs may still be the value picks in the beginning, it's more important in this kind of league to get one of the top 5 guys: Rodgers, Manning, Brees, Rivers, Brady. Because of the pass TD totals, they separate themselves a little more from the Ryan/Flacco types. Schaub could go either way. Check out the draft kit to see how the overall ranks are affected by 6-pt pass TDs. That should give you a good idea of the positions relative value.

4Ron Hogsett
I agree, this year it seems likes QBs have been going earlier than years past. My strategy has been based on the league I'm drafting in(12man vs 10man, 4 point passer TD vs 6) and my draft position. In a 10 man with Yahoo! default, I can see QB's start going by the 2nd round. I personally like the idea of grabbing a QB early enough to snag a top 5 considering they are top "point-getters" season after season. If you are playing in a smart league, it’s plausible that the top 5 QBs could all be gone by the end of the 2nd round. Drafting a QB late would have to be determined by the quality of RB's you’ve taken in the first two picks and the quality of WR's available in your 3rd and 4th picks, and which QB may be available in the 5th and 6th rounds (typically those outside the top 10). I think waiting beyond the 4th round for a QB would be a mistake. In a 6 point passer TD league, I'd expect the top 10 QB's to be gone by the end of the 2nd round. QB's outside the top 10 have an EV that quickly drops, relative to expected point production. At the expense of a top running back, I'd prefer to see a more consistent QB in the early early rounds of the draft in this situation.So, to answer, I would say drafting first overall in a league with 4 point passer TD is too early, but not in a 6 point passer TD league.

4Matt Gregg
First and foremost, you should always draft for value ahead of position. That said, it's also good to pay attention to who's coming off the board by position, so keep a cheat sheet on hand. I agree w Anthony, you have to get a solid RB in the first two rounds in PPR--then shoot for the best available WR/RB in 3/4. I'd try and take a QB in the 5th since this is an 8 man league.

1Justin Patrick Smith
i hope branch because ive taken that chance

1Jd Dre
I think it depends on who they are playing, NE always goes with who is open, and not who the receiver actually is.

0Daniel Okopnyi
It's any given Sunday, though his record, team management and audible calling is impressive. I am curious to see what he does this year.

0Tim Harding
If your league is PPR then I would take Woodhead over Green-Ellis.

1Nik Bonaddio
Nice! A little help from numberFire too?

0David J
I would agree. The same could be said for Tony Romo as well as all other fantasy relevant players on the Cowboys. Kind of weird how that works out.

1Sean Weinstock
Niners!

2R J
Right, I wouldn't do this either. Brady might be on a high right now but NE is not going to run the football ever. He's got tons of weapons, I'd need to get something crazy like Jennings and Rice or Jennings and Brees.

1James Steigelman
Not sure what the question is here.

1Chad Lybeck
second that yes

0Anthony Best
Ray Rice!!

0Anthony Best
Have to say Brady since I have Foster on my team in the money league!!

2Robert James Smith
I would only trade Brady if you could get Calvin as there is such a huge drop off to Big Ben. You have the best WR as far as points in the league right now which helps make up for your lack of depth. Try and trade Big Ben coming off his 5 TD game with week for a WR2 type player

0Robert James Smith
I had Brees and Cam and I traded Brees away too. I would absolutely do this as Newtons bench points are helping you they are merely an insurance policy to Brady. In PPR Forte is doing a little better than McCoy and the other way around in standard leagues. Forte is the whole offense in Chicago and to competition still cant seem to stop him.

0Naveen Tejwani
You can get a better offer for Cam; personally I wouldn't do it for Brady and CJ. However you will have to take a gamble like that to get back in the race and if you don't start winning now, it won't matter. Look for a little bit better situation in that 2-1 offer.

0Anthony Best
Johnson not worth it. Brady is worth it. In last place you have nothing to lose. But Keep in mind Cam puts up about 30 points a game. While in last few weeks Brady and CJ get close to that combined! I don't mind your Rb's. Maybe try and get a good WR out of this trade.

1Jameson Wooten
Team one: Cam, Sit DJax, start Giants DTeam two: Brady, Roddy, Welker, Boldin, Sproles, Murray, Gronk

0Anthony Best
Toss up. I think Both will struggle! Both are away, but I like Stafford coming of the bye a little better

0Anthony Best
I would actually sit a struggling Brady going against Phi at Phi. He will still get 15-10 points for you, but Stafford is facing a GB D that isn't good against the pass. Detroit also has no running game, just RB's that are short WR's so more upside for Stafford.

0Anthony Best
I will say it's always hard to sit a good name. But I'm some one who will if they are not playing good. Look at Brady's last 5 weeks. in those weeks he has only played 1 good game. but not here with Romo. In my opinion Mia has been the best D over the last 4 weeks.

1Anthony Best
I still think Stafford at home is the better option. Brady is still struggling and pretty sure their center is still going to be the 3rd stringer cause of injuries.

1Keith Goldner
It's an idea, but I wouldn't. I would just stash an able backup who will be in a playoff race just in case. Chances are, Rodgers will still play a half (in which he can put up better fantasy numbers than most other QBs). If you do Brady/Brees, there's a chance they could be benched as well.